We celebrated 20 years from the fall of the wall just recently. I was in Slovakia on 17th of November, the day when with the wall fell also a regime where people were limited, controlled and forbidden to express their opinion. The times of one party and only one opinion diminished. No regime of that kind is possible without people supporting it. There were many people in communist party. Some of them believed in it, some of them chose to join to live in peace and comfort and some of them just chose the power. Those who did not sign papers, who did not join the party and did not support the ideology, could not get to universitites, did not get proper education, were not accepted to jobs, were hindered from the basic securities that a state offers and their families ended up with the same consequences. I remember that my cousin could not get to any school in Slovakia because his father refused to sign.
On 17th of November 2009, 20 years after the revolution, we all got to hear speeches, read memoires, got invovled in the discussions about the day and its impact, we got to see theater pieces showing the happenings of that day. It should not be forgotten and also the generations that did not experience it, should get at least a feeling of how it developed.
The mood is various. Celebrations are in place but at the same time, there are many who claim that evethough the regime has changed and the world has opened, the people who were supporting the power of one party and allowed the cruelty on human beings, those remained in the system and in control.
Just few days after the 20th anniversary I read in newspapers, that there will be four people from the previous regime represented in EU commission. Stefan Fule (Czech republic), Siim Kallas (Estonia), Andris Piebalgs (Latvia) and Maros Sevfcovic (Slovakia). I think it is a total disaster that those people get to go to EU and represent their countries. I think that they have done theirs already and have no position to enter the political space where democracy, solidarity, human rights and peoples involvement in society are valued. Why would they defend it now when they for decades worked against these values? So how do we call this? Second chances? Adjustments? Flexibility? Opportunism? Yeah – call it whatever, but respect towards all those who fought for a change and for those who chose a “no” when “no” was not an option.

Recent Comments